Comments on: http://projectkickass.com You are welcome Internet Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:34:42 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Emerald http://projectkickass.com/1559/comment-page-1/#comment-5285 Emerald Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:34:42 +0000 http://projectkickass.com/1559/#comment-5285 Its legit. I've fed Squirrels and Chipy's right out of my hand in a park in Toronto. I've also had wild flying squirrels perch on my shoulder. You'd be amazed with what you can do when animals trust you. Its legit. I’ve fed Squirrels and Chipy’s right out of my hand in a park in Toronto. I’ve also had wild flying squirrels perch on my shoulder. You’d be amazed with what you can do when animals trust you.

]]> By: Stacy http://projectkickass.com/1559/comment-page-1/#comment-5238 Stacy Sun, 07 Mar 2010 13:25:55 +0000 http://projectkickass.com/1559/#comment-5238 If I were going to spend time photoshopping, I'd probably use unicorns, not chipmunks. Just saying. I don't know if it's real, but I think it's great and can't imagine in what way the authenticity of these photo could affect me after I hit "stumble" again. If I were going to spend time photoshopping, I’d probably use unicorns, not chipmunks. Just saying. I don’t know if it’s real, but I think it’s great and can’t imagine in what way the authenticity of these photo could affect me after I hit “stumble” again.

]]> By: Kaya http://projectkickass.com/1559/comment-page-1/#comment-5205 Kaya Sun, 21 Feb 2010 01:03:46 +0000 http://projectkickass.com/1559/#comment-5205 really does it take anymore than this http://www.flickr.com/photos/powerpig/2968532917/in/set-72157600129693607/ to change ur mind about the riding one? just because this guy is kickass doesnt mean every lame computer geek who stumbles this needs to put in their two cents really does it take anymore than this http://www.flickr.com/photos/powerpig/2968532917/in/set-72157600129693607/ to change ur mind about the riding one?
just because this guy is kickass doesnt mean every lame computer geek who stumbles this needs to put in their two cents

]]> By: Medafil http://projectkickass.com/1559/comment-page-1/#comment-5200 Medafil Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:46:48 +0000 http://projectkickass.com/1559/#comment-5200 These are awesome pictures. I have to say that I am certain that all but the last two are legit minus the riding one. Some people may be complaining about the focus and pixels and such, it's not. I will make note that I'm not absolutely certain about the last two, but the ones before all use a photo technique called depth of field. This is where you take a camera and manually set the aperture and shutter speed. These photos use shallow depth of field, meaning that the subject is in focus, but anything not in the range of the focus is blurry. Can be used to make some very strong photos. For those of you interested, shallow depth of field can be achieved by a large aperture and fast shutter speed. However, if you want deep depth of field, where everything is in focus, provided the camera is held still, you make a very small aperture, but set the shutter speed for a longer period of time. The rider, I'm not sure how they'd get that on the chipmunk without it bolting. The second to last one, I'm not sure if the floating objects were shopped in, or if they were dropped in the middle of the shot. And the very last one, I'm not sure, but my gut tells me something is wrong with it. I think I may be getting thrown off by the color contrast of the orange chipmunk on the TIE fighter. All in all though, these are amazing pictures and I wish I had been there to see these unfold. These are awesome pictures. I have to say that I am certain that all but the last two are legit minus the riding one. Some people may be complaining about the focus and pixels and such, it’s not. I will make note that I’m not absolutely certain about the last two, but the ones before all use a photo technique called depth of field. This is where you take a camera and manually set the aperture and shutter speed. These photos use shallow depth of field, meaning that the subject is in focus, but anything not in the range of the focus is blurry. Can be used to make some very strong photos.

For those of you interested, shallow depth of field can be achieved by a large aperture and fast shutter speed. However, if you want deep depth of field, where everything is in focus, provided the camera is held still, you make a very small aperture, but set the shutter speed for a longer period of time.

The rider, I’m not sure how they’d get that on the chipmunk without it bolting.
The second to last one, I’m not sure if the floating objects were shopped in, or if they were dropped in the middle of the shot.
And the very last one, I’m not sure, but my gut tells me something is wrong with it. I think I may be getting thrown off by the color contrast of the orange chipmunk on the TIE fighter.

All in all though, these are amazing pictures and I wish I had been there to see these unfold.

]]> By: the shadow of the wind http://projectkickass.com/1559/comment-page-1/#comment-5194 the shadow of the wind Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:48:45 +0000 http://projectkickass.com/1559/#comment-5194 MUMU, you need your eyes checked. Those are high resolution pictures from a camera. I work with photoshop and I can tell you that while you can make realistic pictures or tweak photos w/PS, pixels are going to be in every digital pictures. MUMU, you need your eyes checked. Those are high resolution pictures from a camera. I work with photoshop and I can tell you that while you can make realistic pictures or tweak photos w/PS, pixels are going to be in every digital pictures.

]]> By: Ed http://projectkickass.com/1559/comment-page-1/#comment-5193 Ed Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:35:54 +0000 http://projectkickass.com/1559/#comment-5193 Dude, there's always people unacquainted with trolls... I can't believe that people take this crap seriously. Dude, there’s always people unacquainted with trolls… I can’t believe that people take this crap seriously.

]]> By: mumu http://projectkickass.com/1559/comment-page-1/#comment-5190 mumu Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:37:07 +0000 http://projectkickass.com/1559/#comment-5190 FFS, thse are so clearly shopped it's unreal. Just look at the shadows and the size of the pixels and you can tell straight away they've been shopped. Although I may have a slight advantage as I've seen quite a few shops in my time. FFS, thse are so clearly shopped it’s unreal. Just look at the shadows and the size of the pixels and you can tell straight away they’ve been shopped. Although I may have a slight advantage as I’ve seen quite a few shops in my time.

]]>