Star Wars Chipmunk photos by http://flickr.com/powerpig.
He has some new photos that will rock your face off.

548922812_155586b61c

2682867554_aa3dbfc5b8

2878681351_76e6388530

3494431714_cace6c00dd

3610434595_243d5e4d70

3675190767_6033b51e66

3766073868_b6b81beb3e

3919864186_8ff30b2907

  • #1 written by joooooooooo
    about 5 months ago

    Very cool. Is that a pet chipmunk or a wild one?
    Also, first.

  • #2 written by surveygirl46
    about 5 months ago

    That is hysterical, cute and rather disturbing in a South Parkian kind of way….I LOVE IT…

  • #3 written by props
    about 5 months ago

    i dig it

  • #4 written by eiei o
    about 5 months ago

    that chipmunk looks like a real hard nut

  • #5 written by Brian
    about 5 months ago

    awesome! the CGI seems so real!

  • #6 written by tom
    about 5 months ago

    It’s not a squirrel its a Chipmunk! :)

    And Brian, its not CGI, I have done similar pictures with my friends chipmunk! :)

  • #7 written by jkf
    about 5 months ago

    shopped

  • #8 written by a
    about 5 months ago

    FIRST

  • #9 written by mike
    about 5 months ago

    no its not photoshopped they just put a nut nut somewhere and wait for a chipmunk that they feed often to come and get it then they take the pic

  • #10 written by Robert
    about 5 months ago

    yep, kickass! stumbled….

  • #11 written by MK
    about 5 months ago

    you have to be retarded on a serious level to declare this “shopped”. get a life dude.

  • #12 written by Praveen Sawh
    about 4 months ago

    How about the one with the figure on top of the chipmunk? How’d they do that?

  • #13 written by Ellie
    about 4 months ago

    well, chipmunks are curious, they smell everything… so they must have put a nut, wait for the chipmunk to come, then he was so curious about the “strange thing” he smelled it

  • #14 written by wash(the_hands)
    about 4 months ago

    FAIL

  • #15 written by constansis
    about 4 months ago

    Shopped…you can tell by the pixels.

  • #16 written by asd
    about 4 months ago

    The force isnt real. Shopped.

  • #17 written by Psynister
    about 3 months ago

    The only one that’s not especially believable is the one where the figure’s riding it. That one I don’t really buy.

    The rest of them are realistic enough that I could believe them.

    Either way, they make for interesting pics. I couldn’t care less if they’re real or not, they managed to entertain me for a few.

  • #18 written by Cory
    about 3 months ago

    Hey constansis, I’m impressed with your superhuman vision that you can see the difference in pixelization to claim this is shopped. How about you use your fucking brain and think about the light source and the resulting shadows. I doubt whoever put these pictures up took the time to fill that in. If you’re saying this just to piss off people like me… good job, you got me.

  • #19 written by Erin
    about 3 months ago

    having a photoshop war… nerds…

  • #20 written by bab
    about 3 months ago

    pixels give it away

  • #21 written by Pedro
    about 3 months ago

    this is absolutly NOT photoshopped. the one with the force might be. but the rest are NOT.

  • #22 written by Sarah
    about 2 months ago

    These aren’t photoshopped. And it’s obviously a pet chipmunk, a very friendly one. Maybe he blu-tacked the figure to it’s back? Idk.

  • #23 written by Sean
    about 2 months ago

    Hahahaha what the hell, people see pictures and instead of taking them for what they are (which is art) everyone argues about if its shopped, You dont go to an art gallery and argue about the work on the walls do you? no fucking way your ass would be kicked out, so what I am trying to say is, shut the hell up, chill the hell out, and just enjoy the fucking scenery at least for once in your lives

  • #24 written by Sarah Bourne
    about 2 months ago

    If you followed the link, you could have found the entire collection and the story of how the chipmunk(s) became friends. For the “SHOPPED!” crowd, I call your attention to http://www.flickr.com/photos/powerpig/2968532917/in/set-72157600129693607/ showing what happens when the chipmunk moves.

  • #25 written by Sheri Noble
    about 2 months ago

    Very cute. Don’t care if it is shopped or not. It is entertaining.

  • #26 written by Tallian
    about 2 months ago

    This isn’t shopped, its just a squirrel who wins +5 internets

  • #27 written by teresa
    about 2 months ago

    no, i’ve seen this before on the site belonging to the gent who made them. he has about 6 trained chipmunks. it is for real. and for those who must insist on sreaming “shopped” on ANYTHING they see, I am sure you have barely touched photoshop to even know. I bet you would be surprised to know how many things we take for granted are actually epically photoshoped.

  • #28 written by Shaun
    about 1 month ago

    Oh Stumble, this is why I love you.

  • #29 written by Agouti
    about 1 month ago

    shopped is a joke from /b/.

    It is especially funny to claim, even on the most mundane photos: Shopped, I can tell because I ‘ve seen a lot of shopped things and the pixels.

    • #30 written by F
      about 1 month ago

      The commentators on this site seem to be strangely unfamiliar with trolls…

      • #31 written by Ed
        about 4 weeks ago

        Dude, there’s always people unacquainted with trolls… I can’t believe that people take this crap seriously.

  • #32 written by dalliance
    about 1 month ago

    wow you guys are getting trolled hard

  • #33 written by Ryan
    about 1 month ago

    A.) Seems as if they are using a collection of taxidermy-recreated squirrels with similar color patterns. Still, very entertaining.
    B.) Ya’ll are getting trolled…. hard.

  • #34 written by mumu
    about 1 month ago

    FFS, thse are so clearly shopped it’s unreal. Just look at the shadows and the size of the pixels and you can tell straight away they’ve been shopped. Although I may have a slight advantage as I’ve seen quite a few shops in my time.

  • #35 written by the shadow of the wind
    about 4 weeks ago

    MUMU, you need your eyes checked. Those are high resolution pictures from a camera. I work with photoshop and I can tell you that while you can make realistic pictures or tweak photos w/PS, pixels are going to be in every digital pictures.

  • #36 written by Medafil
    about 3 weeks ago

    These are awesome pictures. I have to say that I am certain that all but the last two are legit minus the riding one. Some people may be complaining about the focus and pixels and such, it’s not. I will make note that I’m not absolutely certain about the last two, but the ones before all use a photo technique called depth of field. This is where you take a camera and manually set the aperture and shutter speed. These photos use shallow depth of field, meaning that the subject is in focus, but anything not in the range of the focus is blurry. Can be used to make some very strong photos.

    For those of you interested, shallow depth of field can be achieved by a large aperture and fast shutter speed. However, if you want deep depth of field, where everything is in focus, provided the camera is held still, you make a very small aperture, but set the shutter speed for a longer period of time.

    The rider, I’m not sure how they’d get that on the chipmunk without it bolting.
    The second to last one, I’m not sure if the floating objects were shopped in, or if they were dropped in the middle of the shot.
    And the very last one, I’m not sure, but my gut tells me something is wrong with it. I think I may be getting thrown off by the color contrast of the orange chipmunk on the TIE fighter.

    All in all though, these are amazing pictures and I wish I had been there to see these unfold.

  • #37 written by Kaya
    about 3 weeks ago

    really does it take anymore than this http://www.flickr.com/photos/powerpig/2968532917/in/set-72157600129693607/ to change ur mind about the riding one?
    just because this guy is kickass doesnt mean every lame computer geek who stumbles this needs to put in their two cents

  • #38 written by Stacy
    about 1 week ago

    If I were going to spend time photoshopping, I’d probably use unicorns, not chipmunks. Just saying. I don’t know if it’s real, but I think it’s great and can’t imagine in what way the authenticity of these photo could affect me after I hit “stumble” again.

No trackbacks yet.